Benchmarks

Mesh beats frontier models and agents at 1/30th the cost.

AIOpsLab is Microsoft Research's benchmark for autonomous-cloud agents: 86 incident scenarios across detection, localization, diagnosis, and mitigation. Mesh is self-learning — it builds context from every verified outcome and carries that understanding into the next incident.

Benchmark average

Mesh 91.4%
Competitor avg 69.8%

AIOpsLab results

Cerebral Systems (Mesh) 91.4%
Claude Code 80.5%
Vorflux 72.4%
AOI 66.3%
Claude Code 60.0%
What's measured

Four tasks, one incident lifecycle.

AIOpsLab injects a real fault into a live microservice deployment, then scores each step an on-call engineer would normally perform.

01

Detection

Notice the incident before it is handed a hint about where to look.

Mesh 94.12%
02

Localization

Pinpoint the failing component inside the service graph.

Mesh 100%
03

Diagnosis

Identify the root cause instead of stopping at the symptom.

Mesh 100%
04

Mitigation

Choose the action that resolves the incident safely.

Mesh 93.3%
Full AIOpsLab board

Published baselines, kept visible.

The table preserves every current row and task score so the headline remains auditable.

# Agent Model Detection Localization Diagnosis Mitigation Average
1 MeshBest Cerebral Systems DeepSeek V4 Flash 94.12 100 100 93.3 91.39
2 Claude Code native agentic claude-opus-4-8 100 71.4 38.5 100 80.5
3 Vorflux agentic 75.0 67.9 46.2 100 72.4
4 AOI open-weight + AOI Qwen3-14B 100 53.6 30.8 46.2 66.3
5 Claude Code agentic CLI claude-opus-4-7 88.2 71.4 23.1 57.1 60.0
6 AOI frontier GPT-4o-mini 90.6 32.1 38.5 53.8 58.1
7 AOL-agent frontier Claude Sonnet 4.5 68.8 53.6 15.4 76.9 57.0
8 STRATUS multi-agent GPT-4o-mini 78.1 25.0 15.4 23.1 43.0
9 STRATUS multi-agent Qwen3-14B 75.0 32.1 7.7 15.4 41.9
10 AOL-agent baseline GPT-4o-mini 25.0 9.5 7.7 7.7 14.7

Baseline figures as reported in the AIOpsLab, STRATUS, and AOI papers. Open-weight AOI / STRATUS rows report best@5 across five runs; frontier-model rows are single-run. Mesh figures are from our own AIOpsLab run on DeepSeek V4 Flash, averaging a 49.14s runtime per scenario. The Claude Code rows are our own AIOpsLab runs. The claude-opus-4-8 row is its native agentic mode, micro-averaged by task counts (70 of 87 passes = 80.5%); the claude-opus-4-7 row (89 tasks) is shown as the macro average across the four categories (68.5% micro / 61 of 89). The Vorflux row is our own AIOpsLab run, micro-averaged by task counts (63 of 87 = 72.4%; detection 24/32, localization 19/28, diagnosis 6/13, mitigation 14/14).

Benchmark 02 · Loghub

The log-analysis board, without hiding harness quality.

Mean reward over 180 log-parsing and analysis tasks. Mesh takes the top two spots and finishes with zero harness errors.

Mesh Loghub profile deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
0.915
Mesh Loghub profile mimo-v2.5-pro
0.892
Claude Code claude-opus-4-7
0.878
Raw mini-swe-agent mimo-v2.5-pro
0.861
Raw mini-swe-agent deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
0.860
Devin devin
0.747
# Harness Model / agent Tasks Mean reward Fully solved Errors
1 Mesh Loghub profileBest deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash 180 0.915 66 (37%) 0
2 Mesh Loghub profile mimo-v2.5-pro 180 0.892 64 (36%) 0
3 Claude Code claude-opus-4-7 180 0.878 45 (25%) 0
4 Raw mini-swe-agent mimo-v2.5-pro 171/180 0.861 32 2
5 Raw mini-swe-agent deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash 180 0.860 31 (17%) 0
6 Devin devin 180 0.747 38 (21%) 26

Harness: harbor==0.13.1. Mean reward is the harness's per-task score averaged over all 180 tasks; “fully solved” counts tasks that reached maximum reward. Mesh runs the same harbor harness as the baselines — only the orchestration profile differs. Errors are tasks the harness failed to complete cleanly.

The same engine, running on your stack.
The numbers above are the floor.